Why the study?
Do brachial and central blood pressures have differential impacts on left ventricular load and arterial damage in the general population?
Do brachial and central blood pressures have differential impacts on left ventricular load and arterial damage in the general population?
Central blood pressure is more closely associated with left ventricular load (BNP), while brachial blood pressure is more strongly associated with vascular damage (carotid IMT).
Central BP may better mark LV load and brachial BP vascular damage; leaves open whether differential measurement improves risk stratification.
OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated whether brachial and central blood pressures have differential impact on the cardiovascular system in the general population. METHODS: The study included 706 subjects (59 ± 10 years) who visited our hospital for a physical check-up. Brachial blood pressure and radial artery pressure waveforms were recorded using an automated device, and the pressure corresponding to the radial late systolic peak (SBP2) was taken as central blood pressure. The concentration of B-type natriuretic peptide and the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery were measured and a cross-sectional analysis was performed. RESULTS: Brachial blood pressure was 128 ± 18/74 ± 12 (mean blood pressure, 92 ± 13) mmHg and SBP2 was 120 ± 19 mmHg. Although both brachial systolic blood pressure and SBP2 correlated with B-type natriuretic peptide in a univariate analysis, only SBP2 independently correlated with B-type natriuretic peptide after adjustment for possible factors. In contrast, brachial systolic blood pressure, but not SBP2, independently correlated with carotid artery intima-media thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Central blood pressure is more closely associated with left ventricular load than brachial blood pressure, while brachial blood pressure is more strongly associated with vascular damage than central blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: