Why the study?
The study aimed to identify mild cognitive impairment as a clinical alert for an increased probability of major acute vascular events, such as ischemic stroke and heart attack.
Is Mild Cognitive Impairment associated with an increased risk of major acute vascular events?
Is Mild Cognitive Impairment associated with an increased risk of major acute vascular events?
Mild cognitive impairment may serve as an early clinical indicator of increased risk for major acute vascular events like ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction.
aMCI-MD was associated with higher MVE incidence; hypothesis-generating for MCI as vascular risk marker.
Background: The study aimed to identify Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) as an alert clinical manifestation of increased probability of major acute vascular events (MVEs), such as Ischemic Stroke and heart attack. Methods: In a longitudinal study, 181 (M = 81, F = 100; mean age of 75.8 ± 8.69 years) patients were enrolled and divided into three groups based on diagnosis: Subjective Cognitive Impairment (SCI), amnestic MCI Single Domain (aMCI-SD), and amnestic MCI More Domain (aMCI-MD). Clinical assessment and the presence of vascular risk factors were collected. Results: The distribution of MVEs showed a higher incidence in the first two years of follow-up of 7.4% in SCI, 12.17% in aMCI-SD, and 8.57% in aMCI-MD. Acute Myocardial Infarction showed a major incidence in one year of follow-up (41%) and in two years of follow-up (29%). Also, Ischemic Stroke showed a major incidence in one year of follow-up (30%) and in two years of follow-up (40%). A statistically significant difference in the progression to dementia was shown (SCI 3.75%; aMCI-SD 10.43%; aMCI-MD 37%; p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: MCI is considered an expression of the systemic activation of mechanisms of endothelial damage, representing a diagnosis predictive of increased risk of MVEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauriola et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: