Why the study?
The transition of anticoagulation therapy following the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants in AF patients with severe renal dysfunction remained to be elucidated.
How have antithrombotic therapy trends and clinical outcomes changed over 10 years in patients with atrial fibrillation and varying degrees of renal dysfunction?
How have antithrombotic therapy trends and clinical outcomes changed over 10 years in patients with atrial fibrillation and varying degrees of renal dysfunction?
Despite the introduction of DOACs improving outcomes in AF patients with mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for those with severe renal dysfunction (CrCl <30 mL/min) have remained unchanged over the past decade.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice for atrial fibrillation patients with severe renal dysfunction; leaves open the.
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has undergone major changes following the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2011. However, the transition of anticoagulation therapy for AF patients with severe renal dysfunction remains to be elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Follow-up data, including creatinine clearance (CrCl), were available for 3,706 patients in the Fushimi AF Registry. We divided patients into 3 groups based on CrCl as follows: (1) CrCl ≥50 mL/min; (2) 50 mL/min>CrCl≥30 mL/min; and (3) CrCl <30 mL/min. In patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 50>CrCl≥30 mL/min, prescription of oral anticoagulants increased year-by-year from 2011 to 2021 with a growing proportion of DOAC; however, the prescription of oral anticoagulants remained almost unchanged in those with CrCl <30 mL/min. In patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 50 mL/min>CrCl≥30 mL/min, the incidence of adverse events, including stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding, was lower among patients enrolled after 2014 than before 2013. However, these trends were not seen in patients with CrCl <30 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased use of DOAC in patients with AF since 2011, anticoagulation therapy for AF patients with severe renal dysfunction has largely remained unchanged, and a reduction in adverse events in those patients has not been observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masunaga et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: