Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for the detection of cardiovascular risk.
Does the CKD-EPI equation improve the detection of cardiovascular risk compared to the MDRD equation in adults?
Does the CKD-EPI equation improve the detection of cardiovascular risk compared to the MDRD equation in adults?
The CKD-EPI equation provides more appropriate detection of cardiovascular risk compared to the MDRD equation by better reclassifying older individuals and males.
CKD-EPI may refine CV risk stratification versus MDRD; leaves open need for outcome trials before practice change.
Objectives: The study aimed to compare the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) and the Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations for the detection of cardiovascular risk. Methods: Data of 9,970 Tehranian participants aged ≥ 20 years were analyzed. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), its risk factors, and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk were compared across the categories of glomerular filtration rate based on the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to each equation. Results: The prevalence of CKD weighted to the 2016 Tehranian urban population was 11.0% (95% confidence interval: 10.3 - 11.6) and 9.7% (9.1 - 10.2) according to the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations, respectively. Besides, 8.3% and 1.5% of the participants with CKDMDRD and non-CKDMDRD were reclassified to non-CKDCKD-EPI and CKDCKD-EPI categories, respectively. Participants with CKDCKD-EPI but without CKDMDRD were more likely to be male and older, and more frequently had diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CVD, when compared to those without CKD according to both equations; they were also more likely to be male, older, and smokers, and had less dyslipidemia and more CVD, when compared to those with CKD by using both equations. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, compared to CKDMDRD, the odds of CKDCKD-EPI were significantly higher for older age and lower for the female gender. Conclusions: Compared to MDRD, the CKD-EPI equation provides more appropriate detection of cardiovascular risk, which is caused by the reclassification of older individuals and fewer females into lower eGFR categories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mousapour et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: