Why the study?
Coronary microvascular dysfunction affects approximately 40% of patients with INOCA and is associated with inflammation, motivating investigation into whether coronary perivascular adipose tissue inflammation assessed by CCTA relates to invasive CFT results.
Does coronary perivascular fat attenuation index by CCTA correlate with invasive coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with INOCA?
Does coronary perivascular fat attenuation index by CCTA correlate with invasive coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with INOCA?
Coronary perivascular fat attenuation index by CCTA does not correlate with invasive measures of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with INOCA.
FAI by CCTA showed no correlation with invasive CMD in INOCA; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is present in approximately 40% of patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and has been associated with inflammation. We investigated associations between measures of inflammation of the coronary perivascular adipose tissue assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and results of invasive coronary function testing (CFT) to diagnose CMD. METHODS: Adults referred for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography who had less than 50% stenosis in all epicardial arteries were prospectively enrolled. CMD was defined as a coronary flow reserve (CFR) less than 2.5 or index of microvascular resistance (IMR) greater than or equal to 25 using bolus thermodilution in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Coronary perivascular fat attenuation index was assessed by CCTA in the right coronary artery (RCA) and LAD. T tests were used to evaluate differences in perivascular FAI by CMD status. RESULTS: A total of 31 participants underwent CFT and CCTA. The mean age was 58 ± 11.7 years, 77% were female, and 61% were white. CMD was present in 15 participants (48%). No differences in perivascular FAI were observed in patients with and without CMD, either in the RCA [-74.2 ± 9.8 vs. -69.9 ± 10.3 Hounsfield units (HU), P = 0.24] or LAD (-76.4 ± 10.2 vs. -74.8 ± 12.7 HU, P = 0.69). Perivascular FAI was not correlated with CFR or IMR measurements in the RCA or LAD. CONCLUSION: There were no associations between CMD diagnosed by invasive CFT and perivascular FAI by CCTA in patients with INOCA. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between vascular inflammation and CMD in INOCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smilowitz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: