Why the study?
Does a clampless facilitating device reduce cerebral embolic events compared to a partial-occluding clamp in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass?
Does a clampless facilitating device reduce cerebral embolic events compared to a partial-occluding clamp in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass?
Using a clampless facilitating device for proximal anastomoses during off-pump CABG significantly reduces intraoperative cerebral embolic events compared to partial aortic clamping in patients with mild aortic disease.
Favors clampless devices over partial clamping to limit emboli in off-pump CABG; extends RCT evidence for technique selection.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a clampless facilitating device (CFD) to perform proximal aortocoronary anastomoses would result in a lower incidence of cerebral embolic events compared with a partial clamping strategy during off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). After epiaortic ultrasound confirmed the mild aortic disease (Grades I and II), 57 patients were randomly assigned to have proximal anastomoses using a partial-occluding clamp (CL, n = 28) or a CFD [Heartstring (HS), n = 29] (Maquet Cardiovascular LLC, San Jose, CA). Solid and gaseous emboli in the middle cerebral arteries were detected using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. The mean number of proximal anastomoses was similar between groups 1.93 ± 0.72 (CL) and 1.72 ± 0.70 (HS) (P = 0.28). The mean number of gaseous plus solid emboli was greater in the CL group than the HS group (90.0 ± 64.0 vs. 50.8 ± 36.6, P = 0.01). Emboli were fewest in patients undergoing HS anastomoses using the suction device. The number of intraoperative cerebral emboli was proportional to the number of proximal anastomoses in the HS groups, but independent of the number of proximal anastomoses in the CL groups. Among patients with a low burden of aortic atherosclerosis, partial clamping of the ascending aorta during OPCAB was associated with more cerebral embolic events compared with an anastomosis with a CFD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zayat et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: