Why the study?
Heart failure is associated with notable morbidity and mortality, necessitating novel therapies.
Do sacubitril/valsartan, SGLT2 inhibitors, and vericiguat reduce hospitalisations for heart failure or cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure?
Do sacubitril/valsartan, SGLT2 inhibitors, and vericiguat reduce hospitalisations for heart failure or cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure?
Sacubitril/valsartan, SGLT2 inhibitors, and vericiguat effectively reduce heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death in HFrEF, with varying efficacy across other ejection fraction phenotypes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reinforces use of all three agents in HFrEF; confirms differential benefits of sacubitril/valsartan and SGLT2 inhibitors across HF phenotypes.
Heart failure is associated with notable morbidity and mortality, and therefore, novel therapies are needed. This minireview focused on the effects and mechanisms of action of sacubitril/valsartan, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and vericiguat in heart failure patients. A systematic review of the current literature was conducted. Seventeen randomised clinical trials regarding the effects of these drug classes were included. The mechanism of action of each treatment could improve pathophysiological imbalances present in heart failure. All three drug classes revealed a reduction in hospitalisations for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Sacubitril/valsartan also reduced hospitalisations and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with mid-range ejection fraction, but not in patients with preserved ejection fraction. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, sotagliflozin and empagliflozin, reduced hospitalisations and death from cardiovascular causes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. None of the three drug classes was associated with a higher prevalence of treatment discontinuation due to increases in adverse effects in large-scale randomised clinical trials compared with placebo. Further studies are required to clarify the extent of effects of these medications in different subpopulations-especially in patients with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norre et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: