Investigates predictors of sleep quality in adolescents after concussion, indicating the need for individualized assessments.
Purpose Post-concussion sleep dysregulation is associated with greater symptom severity and slower recovery. In adolescents, post-injury sleep quality is associated with widespread decreased white matter integrity at 7+ days post-injury, but not before that, suggesting that a unique phenotype may emerge in early recovery. We hypothesized that anxiety-related variables would best predict sleep quality across the first two weeks post-injury due to sympathetic hyperarousal. Method One hundred and fifty-five participants (46% female) aged 11-18 (15.18 +/- 1.8) years were recruited from multiple specialty concussion clinics within 7 days (d) of injury. Participants completed demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, the PROMIS-Anxiety and PROMIS-Depression questionnaires, and the Adolescent Sleep-Wake Scale (ASWS) at the initial (<7d post-injury) and follow-up (10+ d) visits. Bivariate linear regressions identified predictors of ASWS total sleep at each visit, informing a multiple regression predicting Time 2 ASWS total sleep. Results Worse sleep quality at both Time 1 (4.68 + / - 3.40 d post-injury) and Time 2 (17.28 + / - 5.59 d post-injury) was predicted by mechanism of injury and higher initial symptoms of both anxiety and depression, and Time 2 sleep quality was also associated with personal and family history of anxiety (all p < 0.05). A combined model including all significant factors predicted 14% of the variance in sleep quality at the second visit via initial visit depression symptoms alone (F(1,35)=24.44, p < 0.01). Conclusions Global depression scores may help index the impact of concussion on sleep quality in adolescents, but may obscure intra-individual contributing factors pertinent to intervention. This suggests that an individualized approach to understanding contributors to sleep quality in early recovery may be important to assist in identifying modifiable factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: