Cross-sectional study assesses barriers to condom use in STI clinic attendees, suggesting focus on social factors for prevention.
Background: Consistent condom use is a key preventive measure against sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, condom use remains inconsistent among individuals attending STI clinics. Objective: To assess perceived barriers to condom use across six theoretical domains and identify independent predictors of condom non-use among our STI clinic attendees. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 adults at our STI clinic in South India. Perceived barriers to condom use were measured using a 26-item questionnaire covering six domains. Condom non-use during the last five sexual encounters was the primary outcome. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α. Mann–Whitney U -test analyzed the differences between condom users and non-users. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of condom non-use after adjusting for sociodemographic variables. Results: Condom non-use was reported by 140 participants (70.0%; 95% confidence interval: 63.5–76.0). The stigma associated with condom purchase showed the highest barrier scores. The questionnaire showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.79). Condom non-users had higher misconception-related barrier scores ( P = 0.025). In the multivariable analysis, male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.17; P = 0.008) and unmarried status (aOR: 0.25; P = 0.001) were associated with lower odds of condom non-use. The model exhibited a good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.78). Conclusion: Condom non-use remains prevalent among STI clinic attendees. Sociodemographic and relationship factors outweigh perceived barriers in influencing condom use, highlighting the need for targeted STI prevention interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: