Key result
3D-printed model simulation enables successful percutaneous closure of 2 complex ASDs lacking an inferior-posterior rim.
Why the study?
Transcatheter closure of atrial septum defects can be complicated by inferior-posterior rim deficiency, requiring detailed pre-procedural imaging.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Patient-specific 3D printed cardiac models can facilitate the successful transcatheter closure of complex atrial septal defects with deficient rims by allowing detailed anatomical assessment and pre-procedural simulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid planning for complex ASD closure; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before broader adoption.
Background The transcatheter closure of atrial septum defects (ASDs) can be complicated by inferior-posterior rim deficiency. Percutaneous closure is possible but demands detailed pre-procedural imaging. Case summary In this case, we present a successful percutaneous closure of two secundum ASDs complicated by the absence of the inferior-posterior rim. Pre-procedural simulations were conducted on a printed cardiac three dimensional model based on cardiac CT imaging. Discussion ASDs with an inferior-posterior rim deficiency/absence are associated with an increased risk of device failure in percutaneous closure. Creating a 3D model offers improved understanding of the complex anatomy of the defects and allows pre-procedural simulation of the procedure, which may contribute to successful closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nieuwendijk et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) with absent inferior-posterior rim (n=1). 3D printed cardiac model-guided percutaneous closure was evaluated on Procedural success and symptom resolution. Pre-procedural simulation using a 3D printed cardiac model enabled the successful percutaneous closure of two complex secundum ASDs with an absent inferior-posterior rim.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: