This qualitative analysis explores principals' enactment of educational law and policy in Norway, suggesting improvements in balancing collective and individual rights.
The article examines how school leaders enact policy, with a focus on educational law and curricula. Enactment of policy has largely been studied in high-stakes governance systems. This study investigates the enactment of law and policy in a low-stakes and ‘soft’ educational context, namely the Norwegian. The paper examines how legal regulation and the curriculum as the primary instruments for educational policy are enacted by principals in local schools. We examine school leaders’ understanding and experiences through a critical discourse-oriented analysis of semi-structured interviews, drawing on theoretical perspectives of policy enactment, professional discretion and institutional trust. Findings indicate that principals experience substantial professional discretionary leeway and trust; however, when the law is expanded to include more individual rights, the legal system encroaches on professional discretionary reasoning and space. Implications indicate a need to improve principals’ capacity to attend to collective interests while safeguarding the individual rights of students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meland et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: