Demonstrates improved spatial reasoning in multimodal models, highlighting effectiveness and robustness.
Large multimodal models (LMMs) have greatly improved cross-modal tasks but continue to struggle with spatial reasoning. In particular, they exhibit a bias toward egocentric reasoning and have limited ability to reframe spatial relations allocentrically, making them unreliable under allocentric viewpoints. In response, we first propose a lightweight viewpoint-aware self-correction strategy with low token overhead that serves as an inductive signal, sensitizing the model to frame-of-reference changes and guiding a corresponding shift in its reasoning trajectory. Second, beyond final-answer accuracy, we introduce a multi-hop spatial reasoning trace that decomposes reasoning into a front-hop object identification stage and a back-hop spatial relation inference stage to expose intermediate reasoning states and assess whether genuine viewpoint transformations occur. Third, we further design robustness-oriented metrics, including hop degradation slope (HDS) and minimality and redundancy of multi-hop reasoning (MRR), to enable a finer-grained analysis of multi-hop reasoning behavior. Finally, we conduct comprehensive quantitative and qualitative evaluations on Spatial-CoT and COMFORT to validate the effectiveness of our approach and provide insights into robustness and failure modes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: