Spatial reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) remains vulnerable to hallucination: a model may return a fluent answer while violating metric, geometric, or cross-task constraints. This failure mode is particularly consequential when video-based spatial estimates inform navigation, manipulation, or human oversight. We present COSMES, an inference-time reliability framework for Spatial-MLLMs that connects six complementary mechanisms in one pipeline: geometry-proxy (depth-aware) frame sampling, semantic–geometric dual-branch aggregation, spatial chain-of-thought verification, geometric self-correction, hallucination-pattern detection, and stochastic consistency-based uncertainty estimation. The central contribution is the integration of input-, reasoning-, and output-level safeguards around a frozen spatial MLLM, rather than treating hallucination as only an object-presence or decoding error. COSMES returns not only a task answer but also inspectable reliability evidence, including correction records, consistency warnings, sampling dispersion, and uncertainty intervals. These outputs can provide an operational basis for abstention, re-observation, or human verification when paired with a validated downstream policy. The present evaluation is offline and does not establish calibrated confidence, broad generalization, real-time performance, or safety in deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: