Why the study?
What is the incidence and what are the predictors of failed QRS-T-wave morphology screening for subcutaneous ICDs in ICD outpatients without pacing indications?
What is the incidence and what are the predictors of failed QRS-T-wave morphology screening for subcutaneous ICDs in ICD outpatients without pacing indications?
Approximately 7.4% of ICD outpatients without pacing indications fail S-ICD morphology screening, with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and specific ECG characteristics being strong predictors of failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alerts clinicians to HCM and ECG predictors of S-ICD screening failure; leaves open prospective validation of refined eligibility criteria.
BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) relies on a pre-implantation QRS-T morphology screening (TMS) of the ECG to assure that it reliably detects the QRS complexes and T waves. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of the patients who fail this TMS is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: QRS-TMS was done in 230 consecutive ICD outpatients (75% male, age 57 ± 15 years) without an indication for cardiac pacing, using an ECG simulating the 3 sensing vectors of the S-ICD (TMS-ECG). Patients were defined suitable when at least 1 sensing vector was considered appropriate in both supine and standing position. In total, 7.4% of patients, who were all male, were considered not suitable for a S-ICD according to the TMS-ECG. Independent predictors for TMS failure were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM; odds ratio [OR] 12.6), a heavy weight (OR 1.5), a prolonged QRS duration (OR 1.5) and a R:T ratio <3 in the lead with the largest T wave on a standard 12-lead surface ECG (OR 14.6). CONCLUSION: In patients without an indication for pacing, 7.4% would have been not suitable for a S-ICD according to the TMS. HCM, a heavy weight, a prolonged QRS duration and a R:T ratio <3 in the ECG lead with the largest T wave were independently associated with TMS failure. These data might alert physicians that selection of patients for a S-ICD should be considered with special caution in certain patient groups, because they may not satisfy ECG criteria for adequate sensing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordkamp et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: