Key result
Patients who passed the QRS-T morphology screening during biventricular pacing mode had a higher rate of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to those who did not pass.
Why the study?
Preimplantation QRS-T morphology screening is used to select S-ICD candidates, but its role in predicting response to CRT remains uncertain.
Does passing QRS-T morphology screening during biventricular pacing predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in de novo CRT candidates?
Cohort (n=55)
No
Does passing QRS-T morphology screening during biventricular pacing predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in de novo CRT candidates?
Passing QRS-T morphology screening during biventricular pacing mode is independently associated with a higher likelihood of clinical response and super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TMS passing associated with higher CRT response in this cohort; supports predictive value but leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preimplantation QRS-T morphology screening (TMS) is a composite tool for selecting subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) candidates. However, its role in predicting the patient's response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is uncertain. METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive de novo CRT candidates were enrolled between January 2016 and March 2017. Electrocardiogram (ECG) and TMS were performed before and soon after implantation. The ECG parameters were recorded, including QRS duration and morphology (such as ΔQRS_Index, QTc during biventricular pacing mode [BiV pacing QTc], and QRS/T ratio during biventricular pacing mode [BiV pacing QRS/T ratio]). TMS monitored three sensory vectors of the S-ICD. Six months after implantation, the responses to CRT were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (70.9%) passed the TMS during biventricular pacing mode. At the six-month follow-up, the number of responders and super-responders was significantly higher in the passing group than in the non-passing group (responders: 31/39 [79.5%] vs. 5/16 [31.3%], p<0.001; super-responders: 9/39 [23.1%] vs. 1/16 [6.3%], p=0.020). The super-response rate was higher among patients who passed all three vectors than among those who passed 1 or 2 vectors (3 vs. 2 vectors, p=0.018; 3 vs. 1 vector, p=0.003). A smaller left atrial diameter, vectors that passed TMS during biventricular pacing mode, and larger ΔQRS_Index values were independently associated with good CRT response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that patients on CRT who pass the TMS during biventricular pacing mode are more likely to respond and super-respond to CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=55). Passing QRS-T morphology screening (TMS) during biventricular pacing mode vs. Not passing TMS during biventricular pacing mode was evaluated on Response to CRT (≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume) (p=<0.001). Patients who passed the QRS-T morphology screening during biventricular pacing mode had a higher rate of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to those who did not pass.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: