Why the study?
The study evaluated the effect of 14-day head-up bedrest simulating lunar gravity on human orthostatic tolerance.
Does 14-day head-up bedrest reduce orthostatic tolerance in healthy male subjects?
Does 14-day head-up bedrest reduce orthostatic tolerance in healthy male subjects?
A 14-day head-up bedrest simulating lunar gravity significantly reduces orthostatic tolerance in healthy males, leading to earlier precollapse.
14-day head-up bedrest was associated with reduced orthostatic tolerance; leaves open need for countermeasures in simulated lunar or clinical settings.
The effect of 14-day head-up bedrest (HUBR) on human orthostatic tolerance was studied with participation of 23 apparently healthy male subjects aged 18 to 35 years. HUBR with the head tilted up at +9.6° was to simulate the physiological effects of lunar gravity. Orthostatic tolerance was tested on the day prior to and immediately after HUBR completion with subjects tilted up to +70° for a maximum of 20 min. The parameters recorded before, during, and after the tilt test included blood pressure, ECG, and heart rate, the health status of the subjects was also monitored. In comparison with the baseline testing, HUBR reduced the number of completed tests and increased the number (10 vs. 4) of tests terminated due to precollapse (p < 0.05). The group mean time of orthostatic test (OT) tolerance decreased by 3.8 min (p < 0.01), and the time interval between the test onset and precollapse decreased by 4.7 min (p = 0.055). In most cases, orthostatic disorders following HUBR were described as a hypotensive (vasodepressor) type of tilt-induced collapse with high activity of the chronotropic function of the heart. Several cases of vagus-mediated heart rate deceleration indicated a sharp decline of the sympathetic nervous activity, which is an important mechanism for regulating hemodynamics under altered postural conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vp et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: