This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
CGP 12177A originally was developed as a hydrophilic antagonist to detect cell surface beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors, and subsequently was found to be a partial agonist for the atypical or beta 3-adrenergic receptor. Using hamster cells stably expressing either the human beta 1-, human beta 2- or rat beta 1-adrenergic receptor, we found that CGP 12177A behaved as an agonist of beta 1-adrenergic receptors. Whereas at low concentrations, CGP 12177a behaved as an antagonist and inhibited isoproterenol stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity, at higher concentrations, it stimulated a response even in the absence of isoproterenol. The agonistic properties of CGP 12177A were positively correlated with the level of beta 1-adrenergic receptor expression. Thus, at low receptor of densities, CGP 12177A behaved as a weak, partial agonist whereas as high receptor densities, the drug was a full agonist. At similar high densities of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor, CGP 12177A acted only as a partial agonist. Competition binding studies to membranes from cells expressing beta 1-adrenergic receptors indicated that approximately 90% of the receptors were in a high affinity, guanine nucleotide-insensitive state for CGP 12177A whereas approximately 10% of the receptors were in a lower affinity, guanine nucleotide-sensitive state for CGP 12177A. We propose that the latter receptors are precoupled to stimulatory G proteins and recognize CGP 12177A as an agonist whereas the high affinity, uncoupled receptors recognize CGP 12177A as an antagonist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pak et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: