Key result
Repeated Wingate sprint mean power output was maintained at simulated altitudes up to ~2,150 m but was reduced by 5% at ~3,050 m compared to sea-level.
Why the study?
Sprint-interval training improves aerobic and anaerobic fitness at sea-level, but whether sprint intensity can be maintained in mild to moderate hypoxia was unclear.
Does sprint-interval training in moderate hypoxia maintain mean power output compared to sea-level in highly-trained endurance athletes?
RCT (n=10)
Single-blinded
Randomized crossover
No
Does sprint-interval training in moderate hypoxia maintain mean power output compared to sea-level in highly-trained endurance athletes?
Standardized Mean Difference: -0.28
p-value: p=0.02
Repeated Wingate sprint training can be performed by highly-trained athletes at altitudes up to ~2,150 m without compromising mean or peak power output, making it a feasible high-quality training strategy in moderate hypoxia.
Supports sprint-interval training in moderate hypoxia as viable for athletes; extends RCT evidence on altitude-specific protocols.
Sprint-interval training (SIT) is efficient at improving maximal aerobic capacity and anaerobic fitness at sea-level and may be a feasible training strategy at altitude. Here, it was evaluated if SIT intensity can be maintained in mild to moderate hypoxia. It was hypothesized that 6 x 30 s Wingate sprint performance with 2 min active rest between sprints can be performed in hypoxic conditions corresponding to ~3,000 m of altitude without reducing mean power output (MPO). In a single-blinded, randomized crossover design, ten highly-trained male endurance athletes with a maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2max) of 68 ± 5 mL O2 × min-1 × kg-1 completed 6 x 30 s all-out Wingate cycling sprints separated by two-minute active recovery on four separate days in a hypobaric chamber. The ambient pressure within the chamber on each experimental day was 772 mmHg (~0 m), 679 mmHg (~915 m), 585 mmHg (~ 2,150 m), and 522 mmHg (~3,050 m), respectively. MPO was not different at sea-level and up to ~2,150 m (~1% and ~3% non-significant decrements at ~915 and ~2,150 m, respectively), whereas MPO was ~5% lower (P<0.05) at ~3,050 m. Temporal differences between altitudes was not different for peak power output (PPO), despite a main effect of altitude. In conclusion, repeated Wingate exercise can be completed by highly-trained athletes at altitudes up to ~2,150 m without compromising MPO or PPO. In contrast, MPO was compromised in hypobaric hypoxia corresponding to ~3,050 m. Thus, SIT may be an efficient strategy for athletes sojourning to moderate altitude and aiming to maintain training quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersen et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy highly-trained endurance athletes (n=10). Hypobaric hypoxia (~3,050 m) vs. Sea-level (~0 m, 772 mmHg) was evaluated on Mean power output (MPO) across 6 sprints (5% reduction (effect size -0.28), p=0.02). Repeated Wingate sprint mean power output was maintained at simulated altitudes up to ~2,150 m but was reduced by 5% at ~3,050 m compared to sea-level.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: