Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Six charge-transfer (CT) complexes containing three different octamethylferrocene derivatives (Fe(η 5 -C 5 Me 4 SMe) 2, 1; Fe(η 5 -C 5 Me 4 S t Bu) 2, 2; Fe(η 5 -C 5 Me 4 S) 2 S, 3 ) and TCNQ or TCNQF 4, respectively ( 4 − 9 ), have been prepared and fully characterized. X-ray crystal structural studies of 4, 5, 7, and 9 have been carried out. The CT complexes 4 and 5, containing TCNQ, display stacks of acceptor molecules with noncommon donor/acceptor stoichiometries of 3:7 for 4 and 1:3 for 5, whereas the charge-transfer complexes 7 and 9, containing TCNQF 4, display strongly interacting dimers of acceptor anions. The compounds 4 − 6 behave as semiconductors with room-temperature conductivities up to 3.5 S cm - 1 for 6 . Magnetic susceptibility measurements indicate strong antiferromagnetic interaction for the (TCNQF 4 ) 2 2 - dimers in 7 − 9, the dimers being diamagnetic ( S = 0) at room temperature. Antiferromagnetic interactions are also observed for the three compounds 4 − 6 . To obtain more accurate Land é-g factors for the three possible cations from 1 − 3, the corresponding trihalogenide salts with Br 3 - ( 10 − 12 ) and I 3 - ( 13 − 15 ) were prepared and fully characterized. Their magnetic properties, only deriving from the cations, were measured, and X-ray crystal structural studies have been carried out for the compounds 11, 12, 14, and 15 . For the two compounds containing the tert -butyl substituent ( 11 and 14 ), a DADA structural motif was observed, and with the trithiaferrocenophanium, chains ( 12 ) and networks ( 15 ) of alternating sulfur bridges and trihalogenide anions were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zürcher et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: