Key result
In young, low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, TAVR should be undertaken with caution and guided by a multidisciplinary heart team until long-term clinical trial data become available.
Why the study?
Current evidence, guidelines, and special considerations needed review regarding the use of TAVR versus SAVR in young (<65 years of age), low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement improve outcomes compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in young, low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement improve outcomes compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in young, low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?
This review highlights that TAVR should be used with caution in young (<65 years), low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis until long-term data from ongoing trials become available.
TAVR warrants caution in young low-risk severe AS; leaves open long-term durability versus SAVR.
Aortic stenosis is a common form of acquired degenerative valvular disease associated with poor survival after the onset of symptoms. Treatment options for patients with aortic stenosis in addition to medical therapy include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with either tissue or mechanical valves, or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves via either transfemoral or alternative access routes. In this review, the authors discuss the current evidence and special considerations regarding the use of TAVR versus SAVR in the management of severe aortic stenosis in young (<65 years of age), low-risk patients, highlighting the history of aortic stenosis treatment, the current guidelines and recommendations, and important issues that remain to be addressed. Ultimately, until ongoing clinical trials with long-term follow-up data shed light on whether interventions for aortic stenosis can be broadened to a low-risk population, TAVR in young, low-risk patients should be undertaken with caution and with guidance from a multidisciplinary heart team.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2022) conducted a review in Severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated. In young, low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, TAVR should be undertaken with caution and guided by a multidisciplinary heart team until long-term clinical trial data become available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: