Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ground level concentrations of total reactive nitrogen (NO y ) and NO in the Arctic troposphere were measured at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory site at Barrow, Alaska, from March–November, 1990. After screening out impacts from local and regional pollution sources, a well‐defined seasonal cycle of background NO y concentrations is apparent. Concentrations of 560–620 parts per thousand by volume (pptv) during early spring decayed sharply during April and May to extremely low summertime values (median 70 pptv). NO concentrations were < 8 pptv during most background measurements. However, a pulse of NO to ∼35 pptv (maximum hourly average) occurred coincidentally with the NO y decay. Decomposition of peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) (and perhaps other reservoir NO y species) due to increasing temperatures and/or insolation in late spring may have caused this NO pulse. Furthermore, by converting NO y from a stable reservoir species (PAN) to a more reactive form (NO x ), PAN decomposition is believed to have contributed to the observed NO y decay through formation and deposition of HNO 3 . Through this process of NO x release in response to warming temperatures, the springtime Arctic NO y reservoir may affect springtime O 3 levels both in the Arctic and in the northern mid‐latitudes. During summer, higher NO y and NO concentrations were observed during periods of flow off the inland tundra as compared to marine flow periods, suggesting greater vertical mixing over land. Synoptic flow patterns and diurnal changes had minimal effects on background NO y concentrations. NO y and O 3 concentrations were positively correlated during summer, possibly indicating long‐range transport of both and/or the presence of a midtropospheric NO y reservoir combined with a stratospheric O 3 source. The data presented and discussed here are compared to the results of modeling studies reporting NO y concentration predictions for the Arctic. Current models have been unable to adequately simulate NO y concentrations and speciation in the Arctic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Honrath et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: