Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The significance of occlusive lesions of the parent artery in patients with lacunar syndrome (LS) and small deep infarcts (SDIs) on diffusion-weighted imaging remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the recurrence of stroke in patients with LS and SDIs between those with vs without a parent arterial lesion. DESIGN: Analysis of data from a prospective acute stroke registry. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Using clinical syndrome, diffusion-weighted imaging, and vascular studies, we divided 173 patients into 3 groups: (1) parent arterial disease occluding deep perforators (PAD), LS with SDIs, and a parent arterial lesion (n = 32); (2) small artery disease (SAD) (n = 70); and (3) large artery disease (LAD) (n = 71). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrent strokes and the prognosis were registered for 1 year, and the outcome of the PAD group was compared with that of the SAD and LAD groups. RESULTS: During follow-up, there were 9 deaths (6 vascular) and 18 recurrent strokes. The recurrence rate in the PAD group (16%) was significantly higher than that in the SAD group (1%) (P =.01) but similar to that in the LAD group (17%) (P =.87). The presence of the parent arterial lesion was the only independent predictor of stroke recurrence in patients with LS and SDIs (odds ratio, 13.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-123.9; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Although LS on examination, SDIs on diffusion-weighted imaging, and a stable hospital course suggest lacunar stroke of benign course, our results indicate that the PAD group represents an intracranial type of LAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bang et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: