Key result
Atherosclerotic lesion load and severity were more pronounced with increasing dietary saturated fatty acid content, particularly with beef and milk fat, in Ldlr-/-.Leiden mice.
Why the study?
Dietary fat studies regarding CVD risk have not yielded consistent results, likely due to uncontrolled experimental conditions and confounding factors.
Do different dietary fats (plant vs animal) differentially affect dyslipidemia, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in Ldlr-/-.Leiden mice?
Do different dietary fats (plant vs animal) differentially affect dyslipidemia, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in Ldlr-/-.Leiden mice?
Diets high in saturated fatty acids from animal sources (beef, milk) promote greater atherosclerosis and pro-atherogenic lipid/inflammatory profiles than plant-based unsaturated fats in a mouse model.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is closely associated with obesity through risk factors such as dyslipidemia and chronic low-grade inflammation, which may be affected by diet. Dietary fats have been extensively studied in relation to CVD risk, however these studies have not always yielded consistent results, most likely due to lack in control of experimental conditions and confounding factors. Here we studied the effects of different plant and animal fats on dyslipidemia, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Ldlr-/-.Leiden mice were fed isocaloric energy-dense diets with translational macronutrient composition for 28 weeks. The diets were identical apart from the type of fat they contained: either (1) a mixture of olive and rapeseed oil, (2) sunflower oil, (3) pork fat, (4) beef fat, or (5) milk fat. The fatty acid composition of the diets was determined and effects on circulating lipid and inflammatory risk factors and atherosclerosis were examined, complemented by adipose tissue histology and liver transcriptomics. While visceral fat mass, adipocyte size, and adipose tissue inflammation were not differentially affected by the diets, atherosclerotic lesion load and severity was more pronounced with increasing dietary saturated fatty acid content and decreasing monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acid content, and hence most pronounced with beef and milk fat. These differential effects were accompanied by increases in pro-atherogenic plasma lipids/lipoproteins (e.g., triglycerides, apolipoprotein B), activation of pro-atherogenic cytokine/chemokine signaling pathways in liver, and with circulating pro-atherogenic mediators of inflammation altogether providing a rationale for the differential effects of plant and animal fats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2023) studied Obesity-induced dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. Plant and animal fats (olive/rapeseed oil, sunflower oil, pork fat, beef fat, milk fat) vs. Compared against each other was evaluated on Atherosclerotic lesion load and severity, dyslipidemia, and inflammation. Atherosclerotic lesion load and severity were more pronounced with increasing dietary saturated fatty acid content, particularly with beef and milk fat, in Ldlr-/-.Leiden mice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: