Key result
A natural language processing system accurately detected bicuspid aortic valve from echocardiographic reports with a precision of 0.984, recall of 0.955, and F1-score of 0.969, identifying 84,019 patients with affirmed BAV.
Why the study?
BAV often evades timely diagnosis, and prior to October 2024 no specific diagnosis code existed, limiting retrospective identification.
Observational (n=3,478,658)
Yes
A rule-based NLP system accurately identified bicuspid aortic valve from unstructured echocardiographic reports, creating a cohort of over 84,000 patients to facilitate future research.
Enables large-scale BAV phenotyping from EHRs; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect but often evades timely diagnosis due to variable clinical presentations. Prior to October 2024, no specific diagnosis code existed for BAV, limiting retrospective identification. Objectives To develop and validate a natural language processing (NLP) system for automated extraction of heart valve morphology from echocardiographic reports, with focus on BAV detection. Methods We developed a rule-based NLP system using MedSpaCy to analyze echocardiographic reports from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. The system was trained on 555 manually annotated reports and validated on 170 held-out reports. Performance was measured using precision, recall, and F1-score for valve leaflet structure identification. Results The NLP system achieved excellent performance for BAV detection with precision of 0.984, recall of 0.955, and F1-score of 0.969. When applied to 14,453,591 echocardiographic documents from 3,478,658 patients, the system identified 84,019 patients (2.42%) with affirmed BAV. Among patients identified by the ICD-10 code Q23.81, NLP showed 86.1% concordance, with manual review confirming NLP accuracy in discordant cases. Conclusions This NLP approach enables large-scale retrospective identification of BAV patients from clinical text, creating the largest BAV cohort to date and facilitating future cardiovascular research and clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lynch et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) (n=3,478,658). Natural language processing (NLP) system vs. Manual annotation and ICD-10 codes was evaluated on Bicuspid aortic valve detection performance (F1-score). A natural language processing system accurately detected bicuspid aortic valve from echocardiographic reports with a precision of 0.984, recall of 0.955, and F1-score of 0.969, identifying 84,019 patients with affirmed BAV.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: