Key result
AI-ECG shows limited standalone utility for detecting bicuspid aortic valve with ~0.70 AUC.
Why the study?
Does an AI-ECG model accurately detect bicuspid aortic valve in adult patients?
Cohort (n=13,065)
Does an AI-ECG model accurately detect bicuspid aortic valve in adult patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.704
An AI-ECG model demonstrated modest diagnostic performance for detecting bicuspid aortic valve, indicating limited standalone clinical utility for screening.
Background Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect, associated with a lifetime morbidity burden exceeding 80% and an estimated 7% probability of transmission to first-degree relatives. Hence, echocardiographic screening of relatives is recommended. The aim of our study is to develop an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) model for the detection of BAV. Methods Between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 2023, the Mayo Clinic healthcare system database was searched for patients aged ≥18 years with echocardiograms performed for family history of BAV, abnormal auscultation, a BAV-related diagnosis, or to rule out the condition, and with an electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained within 6 months. Cases were patients with a confirmed BAV diagnosis, and controls were those with normal aortic valves. ECGs were randomly assigned into training (80%), internal validation (10%), and test (10%) groups. The AI-ECG model was built using Keras under TensorFlow. Results A total of 13,065 valid ECG–echocardiogram pairs were included (mean [SD] age, 58 [17] years; 44% women), with a median time of 1 day (interquartile range, 0–3 days) between studies. With a 45% BAV prevalence in the test group ( n = 1301), the area under the curve was 0.704, positive predictive value (PPV) 60.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 69.4%. At a prevalence of 7%, the NPV increased to 96.1%, but the PPV decreased to 12.2%. Conclusions In this retrospective cohort and using the current AI-ECG model, BAV detection showed modest diagnostic performance and limited standalone clinical utility, suggesting that ECG-only screening for BAV may require additional modalities or more refined phenotyping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montoya-Hernández et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Bicuspid aortic valve (n=13,065). Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) vs. Normal aortic valves was evaluated on Detection of bicuspid aortic valve (AUC 0.704). An AI-ECG model for detecting bicuspid aortic valve showed modest diagnostic performance (AUC 0.704; PPV 60.1%; NPV 69.4% at 45% prevalence), indicating limited standalone clinical utility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: