Key result
A pharmacist-led hybrid clinic model significantly increased the average number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient compared to historical in-person care (MD 0.13; 95% CI 0.05-0.21).
Why the study?
Achieving rapid titration of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure patients can be challenging due to limited clinical resources.
Does a pharmacist-led hybrid clinic model improve the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction < 50%?
Cohort (n=98)
No
Does a pharmacist-led hybrid clinic model improve the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction < 50%?
Mean Difference: 0.13 (95% CI 0.05–0.21)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.1% vs 2.8%
A pharmacist-led hybrid clinic model significantly increases the number of guideline-directed medical therapies prescribed to patients with heart failure compared to traditional in-person cardiology visits.
Hypothesis-generating for pharmacist-led hybrid models in HF GDMT optimization; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Background Achieving rapid titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure may be challenging due to limited clinical resources. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid clinic model led by pharmacists in optimizing GDMT. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with an ejection fraction < 50% seen in a hybrid clinic model that included multidisciplinary in-person visits and pharmacist-led telehealth appointments (hybrid) to an in-person model that included only a cardiology provider (historical). The primary end point was the number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient. An exploratory end point included a modified optimal medical therapy score (mOMT). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results Patients in the hybrid cohort (n = 52) increased from 2.5 to 3.1 GDMT at 3 months compared to 2.5 to 2.8 in the historical cohort (n = 46). There was a significantly greater increase in the average number of GDMT at each time interval in the hybrid cohort compared to the historical cohort (difference in changes per interval=+0.13; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.21). More patients were on quadruple therapy at the last study visit (48.1% vs 26.1%, P = 0.025), and the increase in mOMT was significantly higher in the hybrid cohort (difference in changes=+0.036; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.056). Conclusions The hybrid model involving pharmacists was associated with greater initiation of GDMT compared to in-person care without a pharmacist. This study confirms the valuable role of pharmacists in optimizing therapy for patients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aludino et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=98). Hybrid clinic model led by pharmacists vs. In-person model with only a cardiology provider (historical) was evaluated on Number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient (MD 0.13, 95% CI 0.05-0.21). A pharmacist-led hybrid clinic model significantly increased the average number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient compared to historical in-person care (MD 0.13; 95% CI 0.05-0.21).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: