Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A general model of faking on self-report personality test items is proposed and empirically evaluated. The model predicts that differential test item response latencies should be faster for schema-congruent test answers than for noncongruent responses. Thus, individuals faking good should take relatively longer to endorse socially undesirable test item content than desirable test item content. Conversely, individuals faking bad should endorse socially desirable test item content relatively slower than undesirable test item content
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holden et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: