Key result
Multidisciplinary care is linked to more than double the quadruple therapy discharge rates in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Although the efficacy of quadruple therapy in heart failure is well established, the impact of multidisciplinary interventions on its real-world implementation remains unclear.
Does a multidisciplinary intervention improve the implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy and clinical education in hospitalized heart failure patients?
Observational (n=184)
No
Does a multidisciplinary intervention improve the implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy and clinical education in hospitalized heart failure patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 74.4% vs 30.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
A multidisciplinary intervention using a standardized checklist significantly increased the utilization of evidence-based therapies, including quadruple therapy, in hospitalized heart failure patients.
Although the efficacy of quadruple therapy-including angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor-in patients with heart failure is well established, the impact of multidisciplinary interventions on its implementation in real-world clinical practice remains unclear.We retrospectively included 90 patients who received multidisciplinary intervention between April 2023 and March 2024 and 94 patients who received conventional care between April 2020 and March 2021. In the multidisciplinary care group, a standardized heart failure checklist was used to confirm the optimization of heart failure treatment. The rates of nutritional counseling, medication education, and rehabilitation introduction, as well as the implementation rate of quadruple therapy during hospitalization for heart failure, were compared between the groups.The mean age of patients was 75.7 years; 58.6% were male, and 45.3% had their first heart failure hospitalization. Background characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. The implementation rates for nutritional instruction, medication instruction, and rehabilitation were 51.2%, 72.0%, and 88.9% in the multidisciplinary intervention group, which were significantly higher than those in the conventional care group (26.3%, 49.5%, and 54.3%, respectively) (all P < 0.001). The rate of quadruple therapy implementation was higher (74.4%) compared to the conventional care group (30.6%) among the individuals with reduced ejection fraction (P < 0.001).In carefully-selected hospitalized patients with heart failure, multidisciplinary intervention was associated with increased utilization of evidence-based therapies, including quadruple therapy, highlighting its potential to enhance the quality of care in real-world clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onoda et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart Failure (n=184). Multidisciplinary intervention (structured case conferences and standardized heart failure checklist) vs. Conventional care (historical control) was evaluated on Implementation rate of quadruple therapy at discharge among patients with reduced ejection fraction (p=<0.001). Multidisciplinary intervention in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction significantly increased the implementation rate of quadruple therapy at discharge to 74.4% compared to 30.6% with conventional care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: