Key result
The proposed active blood pressure measurement approach reduced measurement time by 34.21% (AIM mode) and 15.78% (ADM mode) compared to a commercial BP monitor, with greater consistency in ADM mode.
Why the study?
Does an active cuff pressure control scheme improve measurement time and consistency compared to a commercial BP monitor in healthy subjects?
Does an active cuff pressure control scheme improve measurement time and consistency compared to a commercial BP monitor in healthy subjects?
A novel oscillometric blood pressure measurement device using active cuff pressure control reduces measurement time and improves consistency compared to commercial monitors.
This paper presents an oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement approach based on the active control schemes of cuff pressure. Compared with conventional electronic BP instruments, the novelty of the proposed BP measurement approach is to utilize a variable volume chamber which actively and stably alters the cuff pressure during inflating or deflating cycles. The variable volume chamber is operated with a closed-loop pressure control scheme, and it is activated by controlling the piston position of a single-acting cylinder driven by a screw motor. Therefore, the variable volume chamber could significantly eliminate the air turbulence disturbance during the air injection stage when compared to an air pump mechanism. Furthermore, the proposed active BP measurement approach is capable of measuring BP characteristics, including systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), during the inflating cycle. Two modes of air injection measurement (AIM) and accurate dual-way measurement (ADM) were proposed. According to the healthy subject experiment results, AIM reduced 34.21% and ADM reduced 15.78% of the measurement time when compared to a commercial BP monitor. Furthermore, the ADM performed much consistently (i.e., less standard deviation) in the measurements when compared to a commercial BP monitor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuo et al. (2017) studied Healthy subjects. Active cuff pressure control scheme (AIM and ADM modes) vs. Commercial BP monitor was evaluated on Measurement time reduction. The proposed active blood pressure measurement approach reduced measurement time by 34.21% (AIM mode) and 15.78% (ADM mode) compared to a commercial BP monitor, with greater consistency in ADM mode.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: