Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Given a sequence of apparently random point events, such as neuronal spikes, one may interpret them as being derived either irregularly in time from a constant rate or regularly from a fluctuating rate. To determine which interpretation is more plausible in any given case, we employ the empirical Bayes method. For a sequence of point events derived from a rate-fluctuating gamma process, the marginal likelihood function can possess two local maxima and the system exhibits a first-order phase transition representing the switch of the most plausible interpretation from one to the other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koyama et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: