This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction Assessment of intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited by large inter-reader variability and lack of stratification in clinical trials and their assessment of treatment responses. Therefore, we aimed to introduce and diagnostically validate multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) with tomoelastography processing for the assessment of lumbar IVD degeneration in healthy volunteers and patients with low back pain. Methods In this prospective single-center study, 60 participants (30 volunteers without low back pain and 30 patients with low back pain, 41 ± 17 years, body mass index 23.9 ± 3.7 kg/m2, 25 women) underwent multifrequency MRE using vibration frequencies from 40 to 70 Hz using a custom-built MRE setup in a 3T MRI scanner (Magnetom Skyra, software version XA30, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Maps of shear wave speed (SWS in m/s) and loss angle (φ in rad), representing stiffness and viscous properties, respectively, were generated using tomoelastography data processing. The Pfirrmann score was used as reference standard to assess lumbar IVD degeneration on sagittal T2-weighted images. Inter-reader agreement (3 readers) and repeatability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis showed good diagnostic performance for detecting IVD degeneration (Pfirrmann score I/II/III/IV/V with n = 7/18/9/18/9, respectively) based on SWS (AUC: ≥II: 0.83, ≥III: 0.91, ≥IV: 0.96, V: 0.97) and φ (AUC: ≥II: 0.88, ≥III: 0.93, ≥IV: 0.98, V: 0.95). Good and excellent inter-reader agreements were found for Pfirrmann score (ICC = 0.87), SWS (ICC = 0.87), and φ (ICC = 0.92), respectively. Good repeatability was demonstrated for SWS (ICC = 0.88) and φ (ICC = 0.88). Discussion Multifrequency MRE with tomoelastography processing allows effective IVD assessment and shows promise as a quantitative clinical imaging modality for assessing IVD degeneration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reiter et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: