Key result
An elevated-stable Life's Essential 8 score trajectory was associated with a 21% reduction in overall cancer risk (HR 0.79) compared to a low-stable trajectory.
Why the study?
While individual components of Life's Essential 8 have been linked to reduced cancer risks, comprehensive studies on score trajectories over time and their relation to cancer risk are lacking.
Does maintaining an elevated-stable Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score trajectory reduce the risk of incident cancer in a general adult population?
Cohort (n=48,330)
Yes
Does maintaining an elevated-stable Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score trajectory reduce the risk of incident cancer in a general adult population?
Hazard Ratio: 0.79 (95% CI 0.7–0.9)
p-value: p=<0.001
Maintaining a high and stable Life's Essential 8 score trajectory is significantly associated with a reduced risk of incident cancer, highlighting the oncological benefits of cardiovascular health optimization.
The "Life's Essential 8" (LE8) is a comprehensive lifestyle assessment tool by the American Heart Association, designed to mitigate cardiovascular disease risk by optimizing lifestyle factors including diet, physical activity, and other health metrics. While individual components of LE8 have been linked to reduced cancer risks, comprehensive studies on LE8 score trajectories over time and their relation to cancer risk are lacking. This study employed the Kailuan cohort, involving 48,330 participants who underwent three health examinations from 2006 to 2010 to determine their LE8 scores. LE8 score trajectories were analyzed using latent mixture modeling, and their association with incident cancer risks was assessed through Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for confounders such as age, biological sex, and lifestyle behaviors. Three distinct LE8 trajectory patterns were identified: low-stable (21.2%), moderate-stable (49.4%), and elevated-stable (29.4%). Participants with elevated-stable trajectories showed a 21% (HR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.70-0.90), 27% (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.92), 51% (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.77), 31% (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.97) and 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.95) reduction in overall, lung, breast, colorectal and liver cancer risk compared to those with low-stable scores. Notably, the protective effect of elevated-stable LE8 scores against breast cancer was pronounced in participants with elevated CRP levels, indicating an interaction between inflammation and LE8 trajectories. Maintaining high and stable LE8 scores significantly associated with reduced cancer risk, underscoring the importance of integrating LE8 into public health and clinical strategies for cancer prevention. Kailuan study, ChiCTR-TNRC-11,001,489. Registered August 24, 2011-Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=8050 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cancer (n=48,330). Elevated-stable Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score trajectory vs. Low-stable LE8 score trajectory was evaluated on Overall incident cancer risk (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90, p=<0.001). An elevated-stable Life's Essential 8 score trajectory was associated with a 21% reduction in overall cancer risk (HR 0.79) compared to a low-stable trajectory.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: