Why the study?
Does intravenous tiapamil reduce arrhythmia burden in patients with coronary heart disease?
Does intravenous tiapamil reduce arrhythmia burden in patients with coronary heart disease?
Intravenous tiapamil effectively reduces the frequency of ventricular premature complexes and lowers ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation among patients with coronary heart disease.
Twenty coronary patients with a median age of 76 years were treated in the coronary care unit with tiapamil, a new Ca2+ antagonist, by intravenous infusion (until December, 1979, the generic name was dimeditiapramine). The following arrhythmias were identified: atrial fibrillation with ventricular rate greater than 95 beats/min (5 patients); supraventricular premature complexes (SVPC) (4 patients); and ventricular premature complexes (VPC), Lown grades 2-4 (15 patients). Electrocardiograms and hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored prior to, during, and after the therapy. In patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm was not restored, but tiapamil decreased the ventricular rate by 54%. In patients with VPC, the median frequency of VPC decreased from 310.5 before tiapamil to 32.5 beats/h at the fourth hour of therapy (p less than 0.01). The median ectopic/sinus beat ratio decreased from 0.083 (pretreatment) to 0.008 at the fourth hour of infusion (p less than 0.10). In one of the patient with an insufficient decrease in the number of VPC, the VPOC changed from class 4a (pretreatment) to class 2 (during the therapy), returning to class 4a after the infusion was stopped. Tiapamil reduced the median systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 8.3 and 7.1%, respectively (p less than 0.05), the third hour. Hypotension and bradycardia were observed in 5/20 patients. The results show that tiapamil is effective against both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, and thus its spectrum of action differs from that of other calcium antagonists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowak et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: