Why the study?
Does nitric oxide production play a role in parasite killing in murine blood-stage malaria?
Does nitric oxide production play a role in parasite killing in murine blood-stage malaria?
Nitric oxide production is not universally required for protection against blood-stage malaria in mice, but its role may be strain-dependent.
NO not required for protection in primary murine malaria models; strain-specific roles remain hypothesis-generating for targeted studies.
Nitric oxide (NO) production has been suggested to play a role as effector molecule in the control of the malarial infections. However, the roles of this molecule are debated. To assess whether blood-stage parasite killing is NO dependent, we investigated the course of blood-stage Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi (Pcc) infections in inducible nictric oxide synthase (iNOS)-deficient mice. Parasitaemia, haematological alterations, and survival were not affected by the lack of iNOS. To exclude a role of NO produced by other NOS, controls included NO suppression by oral administration of aminoguanidine (AG), a NOS inhibitor. As in iNOS-deficient mice, no difference in the parasitaemia course, survival and haematological values was observed after AG treatment. Our results indicate that NO production is not required for protection against malaria in our murine experimental model. However, C57BL/6 mice treated with AG lost their resistance to Pcc infections, suggesting that the requirement for NO production for parasite killing in murine blood-stage malaria might be strain dependent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Favre et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: