Why the study?
Does a non-Newtonian blood analogue fluid exhibit different flow characteristics and wall shear stress compared to a Newtonian fluid in a bifurcated small artery model?
Does a non-Newtonian blood analogue fluid exhibit different flow characteristics and wall shear stress compared to a Newtonian fluid in a bifurcated small artery model?
In vitro modeling demonstrates that blood flow in small bifurcated arteries exhibits non-Newtonian behavior, resulting in lower wall shear stress at the outer wall which may predispose to atherosclerosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Challenges Newtonian assumptions in small-artery models; leaves open in vivo validation of outer-wall plaque risk.
The scope of this work is to study the pulsatile flow of a blood mimicking fluid in a micro channel that simulates a bifurcated small artery, in which the Fahraeus-Lindqvist effect is insignificant. An aqueous glycerol solution with small amounts of xanthan gum was used for simulating viscoelastic properties of blood and in vivo flow conditions were reproduced. Local flow velocities were measured using micro Particle Image Velocimetry (μ-PIV). From the measured velocity distributions, the wall shear stress (WSS) and its variation during a pulse were estimated. The Reynolds numbers employed are relatively low, i.e. similar to those prevailing during blood flow in small arteries. Experiments both with a Newtonian and a non-Newtonian fluid (having asymptotic viscosity equal to the viscosity of the Newtonian one) proved that the common assumption that blood behaves as a Newtonian fluid is not valid for blood flow in small arteries. It was also shown that the outer wall of the bifurcation, which is exposed to a lower WSS, is more predisposed to atherosclerotic plaque formation. Moreover, this region in small vessels is shorter than the one in large arteries, as the developed secondary flow decays faster. Finally, the WSS values in small arteries were found to be lower than those in large ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anastasiou et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: