Why the study?
Does an anaesthesia information management system improve user acceptance and perceived quality of work among anaesthesia staff?
Population
Anaesthesiologists and anaesthetic nurses at the Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital in…
Comparison
Anaesthesia information management system vs Manual/paper record keeping (historical/implied)
Design
Cross-sectional
Follow-up
5 years of routine use
Authors
Loading...
Perceived benefits support continued use in anaesthesia practice; leaves open effects on objective outcomes in prospective trials.
Does an anaesthesia information management system improve user acceptance and perceived quality of work among anaesthesia staff?
After 5 years of routine use, an anaesthesia information management system was well-accepted by clinical staff who felt it improved work quality and preferred it over manual record keeping.
Quinzio et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: