Simultaneous exposure to the NO-donor GEA 3175 and adenosine synergistically inhibits thrombin-induced platelet aggregation in vitro, likely via blockage of the cytosolic Ca2+ signal.
In vitro synergy supports hypothesis generation; leaves open whether combined NO-adenosine effects translate to antithrombotic benefit in vivo.
The influence of the novel nitric oxide-donor GEA 3175 on thrombin- and ionomycin-stimulated human platelets was investigated. The effect of GEA 3175 was compared with that of adenosine, an activator of platelet adenylyl cyclase. 2. GEA 3175 inhibited thrombin-induced secretion of ATP but did not affect aggregation; similar results were obtained with adenosine. 3. Thrombin-stimulated rises in the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration, [Ca2+]i, were dose-dependently inhibited by GEA 3175 and adenosine. GEA 3175 and adenosine maximally reduced the initial rise in [Ca2+]i by 41% and 35%, respectively. 4. Simultaneous exposure to GEA 3175 and adenosine nearly abolished both the functional responses (i.e. aggregation and degranulation) and the rises in [Ca2+]i in thrombin-stimulated platelets. 5. Aggregation and increases in [Ca2+]i triggered in platelets by the Ca(2+)-ionophore ionomycin were only marginally affected by a combination of GEA 3175 and adenosine. 6. GEA 3175 potently increased the guanosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic GMP) content in platelets but did not affect adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) levels. Adenosine did not increase either the cyclic AMP or the cyclic GMP levels in platelets. However, adenosine and GEA 3175 combined significantly elevated the platelet cyclic AMP content. 7. The results show that simultaneous exposure to GEA 3175 and adenosine promotes potent anti-aggregatory properties in platelets in vitro. The findings suggest that blockage of the cytosolic Ca(2+)-signal, which is probably mediated by an amplified cyclic nucleotide response, is an important event during the synergistic inhibition of thrombin-induced aggregation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grenegård et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: