Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two studies investigated the effects of motivational factors on expectancy use in reconstructive memory. Participants were given target's midterm grades for later recall; expectancies about the target's future performance were then manipulated. Participants' desires to see their expectancies confirmed were manipulated by making the target likable or unlikable. The authors hypothesized that when expectancy and liking "matched," participants would give significant weight to their expectancies at retrieval, resulting in expectancy-congruent distortion of the midterm grades. However, when expectancy and liking were "mismatched," expectancies would be discontinued, and participants would show little or no expectancy-congruent distortion. Results supported these predictions. Study 2 varied the order of the expectancy and liking information. Order affected the process by which mismatch participants discounted their expectancies. Results demonstrate that motivations not only may bias memory search but also may affect the reconstruction of existing memory traces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDonald et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: