Why the study?
Does dynamic range setting affect carotid intima-media thickness measurements in non-invasive high-frequency ultrasound images?
Does dynamic range setting affect carotid intima-media thickness measurements in non-invasive high-frequency ultrasound images?
Dynamic range settings significantly alter carotid intima-media thickness measurements, highlighting the need to standardize and report this parameter in ultrasound protocols to ensure validity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic range settings may alter CIMT measurements; leaves open standardization needs in carotid ultrasound protocols.
BACKGROUND: Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) measured with ultrasound (US) is widely used as biomarker for arteriosclerosis and as surrogate endpoint in interventional studies to assess efficacy of drug therapies. Strict US protocols are necessary to ensure reproducibility. The range of US signal intensities used for image formation, the dynamic range (DR), is rarely reported in studies and little is known about its effect on CIMT measurements in humans. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of DR on measurements of CIMT. METHODS: US was used to examine 313 carotid arteries in participants from two different clinical studies. For each artery, images with DR of 40, 55, 70 and 85 dB were captured from the same frozen US frame. Mean CIMT (CIMTmean), maximum CIMT (CIMTmax) and standard deviation of CIMT (CIMTsd) were obtained for all images. CIMT for different DRs were compared using student t-test. RESULTS: CIMTmean for 40, 55, 70 and 85 dB were 0.529, 0.564, 0.590 and 0.605 mm respectively. For CIMTmax the corresponding values were 0.626, 0.667, 0.698, and 0.716 mm. CIMTmean and CIMTmax increased significantly for increasing DR steps (p < 0.01). The relative change in CIMTmean and CIMTmax were largest between 40 and 55 dB (6.7% and 7.0%) and smallest between 70 and 85 dB (2.6% and 2.7%) indicating a declining dependency for increasing DR. CONCLUSIONS: DR significantly changes CIMT measurements and the changes are most prominent for lower DRs. The effect of changing DR is larger in human arteries than in phantoms. Reporting the DR will therefore increase the validity of CIMT data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaarder et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: