Why the study?
Does clonidine reduce the delay between rising systolic blood pressure and baroreflex bradycardia in humans and rats?
Does clonidine reduce the delay between rising systolic blood pressure and baroreflex bradycardia in humans and rats?
Clonidine reduces cardiac baroreflex delay by slowing the heart rate and lengthening the diastolic period, rather than altering central or efferent neural latencies.
Clonidine may modulate baroreflex timing via diastolic effects; leaves open any clinical role in human hypertension pending randomized trials.
The delay τ between rising systolic blood pressure (SBP) and baroreflex bradycardia has been found to increase when vagal tone is low. The α(2)-agonist clonidine increases cardiac vagal tone, and this study tested how it affects τ. In eight conscious supine human volunteers clonidine (6 μg/kg po) reduced τ, assessed both by cross correlation baroreflex sensitivity and sequence methods (both P < 0.05). Experiments on urethane-anaesthetized rats reproduced the phenomenon and investigated the underlying mechanism. Heart rate (HR) responses to increasing SBP produced with an arterial balloon catheter showed reduced τ (P < 0.05) after clonidine (100 μg/kg iv). The central latency of the reflex was unaltered, however, as shown by the unchanged timing with which antidromically identified cardiac vagal motoneurons (CVM) responded to the arterial pulse. Testing the latency of the HR response to brief electrical stimuli to the right vagus showed that this was also unchanged by clonidine. Nevertheless, vagal stimuli delivered at a fixed time in the cardiac cycle (triggered from the ECG R-wave) slowed HR with a 1-beat delay in the baseline state but a 0-beat delay after clonidine (n = 5, P < 0.05). This was because clonidine lengthened the diastolic period, allowing the vagal volleys to arrive at the heart just in time to postpone the next beat. Calculations indicate that naturally generated CVM volleys in both humans and rats arrive around this critical time. Clonidine thus reduces τ not by changing central or efferent latencies but simply by slowing the heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cividjian et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: