Why the study?
Although the short-term benefit of primary PCI in elderly patients with STEMI has been demonstrated, the final long-term survival benefit was unknown.
Does primary PCI improve long-term survival compared to thrombolysis in elderly patients (>75 years) with STEMI?
Does primary PCI improve long-term survival compared to thrombolysis in elderly patients (>75 years) with STEMI?
In elderly patients (>75 years) with STEMI, primary PCI provides a mean final survival benefit of approximately 1.5 years compared to thrombolysis over a 20-year follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Primary PCI should be preferred reperfusion in elderly STEMI; confirms and extends short-term RCT survival benefit to long-term.
BACKGROUND: Although the short-term benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated, the final long-term survival benefit is as yet unknown. AIM: To assess the final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolytic therapy in patients over 75 years of age. METHODS: Patients > 75 years with STEMI were randomised to either primary PCI or thrombolysis. Long-term data on survival were available for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were randomised to primary PCI, 41 to thrombolysis. There were no significant differences in baseline variables. After a maximum of 20 years' follow-up, all patients had passed away. The patients randomised to thrombolysis died after a mean follow-up duration of 5.2 years (SD 4.9) compared to 6.7 years (SD 4.8) in patients randomised to primary PCI (p = 0.15). Thus, the mean final survival benefit of primary PCI was 1.5 years. CONCLUSION: The final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolysis in elderly patients with STEMI is 1.5 years and their life expectancy increases by 28.8%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boer et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: