Why the study?
Conventional MRI yields no signal in the ACL due to short apparent transverse relaxation time, while UTE MRI allows quantitative assessment; this study investigated correlations between human ACL mechanical and microstructural properties and quantitative 3D-UTE-Cones MRI measures.
Does quantitative 3D-UTE-Cones MRI correlate with the mechanical and microstructural properties of human ACL specimens?
Does quantitative 3D-UTE-Cones MRI correlate with the mechanical and microstructural properties of human ACL specimens?
Quantitative UTE-MRI biomarkers show significant moderate correlations with ACL elastic modulus, suggesting they may serve as useful noninvasive tools for ACL mechanical assessment.
UTE-MRI correlations with ACL modulus in animals are hypothesis-generating; human validation required before clinical consideration.
Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often acquires no signal in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) due to the short apparent transverse relaxation time of ACL. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI is capable of imaging ACL with high signal which enables quantitative ACL assessment. This study aimed to investigate the correlations of the mechanical and microstructural properties of human ACL specimens with quantitative three‐dimensional UTE Cones (3D‐UTE‐Cones) MRI measures. ACL specimens were harvested from cadaveric knee joints of 13 (50.9 ± 21.1 years old, 11 males and 2 female) donors. Specimens were scanned using a series of quantitative 3D‐UTE‐Cones T 2 * (UTE‐T 2 *), T 1 (UTE‐T 1 ), Adiabatic T 1ρ (UTE‐Adiab‐T 1ρ ), and magnetization transfer (UTE‐MT) sequences in a wrist coil on a clinical 3T scanner. ACL elastic modulus was measured using a uniaxial tensile mechanical test. Histomorphometry analysis was performed to measure the average fascicle specific surface, fascicle size, and number of cells per unit area. Spearman's rank correlations of UTE‐MRI biomarkers with mechanical and histomorphometry measures were investigated. The elastic modulus of ACL showed significant moderate correlations with UTE‐Adiab‐T 1ρ ( R = −0.59, p = 0.01), macromolecular fraction from MT modeling ( R = 0.54, p = 0.01), magnetization transfer ratio ( R = 0.53, p = 0.01), UTE‐T2* ( R = −0.53, p = 0.01), and average fascicle specific surface ( R = 0.54, p = 0.01). UTE‐MRI showed nonsignificant correlations with histomorphometry measures. UTE‐MRI biomarkers may be useful noninvasive tools for the ACL mechanical assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jerban et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: