Why the study?
Guideline-recommended hs-cTn approaches for suspected MI require fixed assay-specific thresholds and timepoints without directly integrating clinical information.
Does the ARTEMIS machine-learning model improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency for suspected MI compared to guideline-recommended hs-cTn algorithms in ED patients?
Population
2,575 emergency department patients with suspected MI (derivation), 1688 (validation), and 23,411 across 13 international cohorts
Comparison
ARTEMIS machine-learning models vs hs-cTn only and guideline-recommended strategy
Design
Derivation, external validation, and international generalizability study of diagnostic prediction models
Authors
Loading...
May enhance ED efficiency for MI rule-out; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Does the ARTEMIS machine-learning model improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency for suspected MI compared to guideline-recommended hs-cTn algorithms in ED patients?
A machine-learning model integrating clinical variables and hs-cTn concentrations safely ruled out myocardial infarction in up to three times as many patients as standard guideline algorithms.
Neumann et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: