Why the study?
Does the presence of cardiac complications increase the risk of cardiovascular events in Japanese high-risk hypertensive patients?
Does the presence of cardiac complications increase the risk of cardiovascular events in Japanese high-risk hypertensive patients?
Cardiac complications, specifically left ventricular hypertrophy and ischemic heart disease, are strong independent predictors of cardiovascular events in high-risk hypertensive patients.
May warrant closer surveillance in high-risk hypertensives; extends risk stratification data but leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial compared the effects of candesartan and amlodipine on cardiovascular events in Japanese high-risk hypertensive patients. The present study aimed to clarify the effect of cardiac complications on cardiovascular events in patients enrolled in CASE-J. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac complications were defined as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). The primary endpoint was a composite of sudden death, cerebrovascular, cardiac, renal and vascular events. The study group was divided into 2,030 and 2,673 patients with and without cardiac complications. During 3.2 follow-up years, cardiovascular events occurred for a rate of 13.6 per 1000 patient-years in patients without cardiac complications, and 23.1 per 1000 patient-years in patients with cardiac complications (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.22; P<0.001). Furthermore, LVH was associated with the onset of cerebrovascular events (adjusted HR: 2.38; P<0.001), whereas IHD was associated with the onset of cardiovascular death (adjusted HR: 2.22; P<0.05), especially sudden death and other cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac complications are independent predictors for cardiovascular events in Japanese high-risk hypertensive patients. In particular, LVH is related to cerebrovascular events and IHD is related to cardiac death and other cardiac events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueshima et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: