Why the study?
Does the presence or persistence of left ventricular hypertrophy increase the risk of cardiovascular events and renal function decline in high-risk hypertensive patients?
Does the presence or persistence of left ventricular hypertrophy increase the risk of cardiovascular events and renal function decline in high-risk hypertensive patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In high-risk hypertensive patients, the absence or regression of left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular events and better preservation of renal function.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associations of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and its changes with the incidence of cardiovascular events and the time-course of serum creatinine (sCr) levels in high-risk hypertensive patients who participated in the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan trial. METHODS: We analysed data of 1447 patients who underwent echocardiography at enrollment as an observational study irrespective of allocation. According to the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) at the baseline, they were divided into two groups (without LVH, LVMI < 125 g/m2; n = 607 and with LVH, LVMI > or = 125 g/m2; n = 840) and four categories on the basis of LVMI at the baseline and 1 year: absence of LVH (n = 285), development of LVH (n = 97), regression of LVH (n = 155), and persistence of LVH (n = 418). RESULTS: During 3.3 +/- 0.8 years, cardiovascular events occurred in 20 (3.3%) patients without LVH and in 67 (8.0%) patients with LVH (hazard ratio: 2.58; 95% confidence interval: 1.54-4.33; P < 0.001). Among the four categories, absence of LVH was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events than persistence of LVH (hazard ratio: 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.71; P = 0.006), but development or regression of LVH was not. Only in persistence of LVH did the sCr level significantly increase over time (baseline vs. 3 years; 0.92 vs. 1.02 mg/dl, P < 0.001). Adjusted sCr level of absence and regression of LVH at 3 years was significantly lower than that of persistence of LVH (0.89 and 0.90 vs. 0.97 mg/dl, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively), but that of development of LVH was not. CONCLUSION: Protection against LVH is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular events and may be related to the preservation of renal function in high-risk hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasuno et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: