Why the study?
Do ACEI and ARB provide comparable cardiovascular and renal protection in high-risk populations and diabetic patients?
Do ACEI and ARB provide comparable cardiovascular and renal protection in high-risk populations and diabetic patients?
ACEI and ARB offer comparable cardiovascular protection, but ARBs may be preferred for slowing progression to ESRD in type 2 diabetes and have fewer adverse effects.
May support ARB preference in type 2 diabetes for tolerability and ESRD data; leaves open updated head-to-head confirmation.
The development of pharmacologic agents that directly inhibit the angiotensin II receptor (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) has provided clinicians with an alternative to the previously available angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) to downregulate the renin-angiotensin system. This review focuses on the available data that can guide the clinician to the use of these two classes of agents vis à vis their ability to provide cardiovascular (CV) and renal protection. Although the CV protective effect of ACEI in high-risk populations is widely appreciated, whether such an effect is entirely BP independent can be questioned. Most head-to-head comparisons between ACEI and ARB have yielded comparable CV protective effects, with ARB being associated with fewer adverse effects. Likewise, several-but not all-studies have demonstrated a CV protective effect of ACEI when compared with other active agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. One study demonstrated a similar protection with ARB when compared with a beta blocker. In terms of renal protection, there are ample data to support a role for both ACEI and ARB to prevent the progression from microalbuminuria to overt albuminuria in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. However, when progression of renal disease is used as an end point, protection has been demonstrated with ACEI only for type 1 but not type 2 diabetes. In this latter group, only ARB have been shown to slow progression to ESRD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomás Berl (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: