Why the study?
Pervasive gaps in knowledge and care delivery persist in cardiovascular disease in women, requiring action to reduce sex-based disparities and achieve health equity.
Design
Presidential advisory and narrative review
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Comparing data from women with data from men inherently positions data from men as the gold standard. For example, the belief that women having a heart attack will present more often with atypical symptoms carries an undertone that women present in the 'wrong way.'”
“We must urgently address the pervasive gaps in knowledge and health care delivery to reduce gender-based disparities and achieve equity. There is no improving cardiovascular health without achieving health equity.”
“In 2000, as we began to have sex-specific diagnostic, therapeutic and educational messages, CVD mortality among women dropped dramatically. By 2013, for the first time, fewer women than men died of heart disease. Now, we are seeing an increase in CV mortality both among women and men. Women are less healthy, even young women, and are coming to pregnancy with lower levels of heart health. That is one of the more frightening features. We must address women across the life span, with particular attention paid to young women and women of racial/ethnic minorities.”
Clinicians must adopt equity-focused protocols to close awareness and access gaps for women; extends prior data by delivering a structured research and policy roadmap.
This AHA advisory provides a comprehensive framework and call to action to eliminate sex-based disparities in cardiovascular care and research.
A 2022 study conducted a review in Cardiovascular Disease in Women. Cardiovascular disease disparities in women was evaluated. This American Heart Association presidential advisory outlines a comprehensive roadmap to achieve equity in cardiovascular health for women by addressing gaps in epidemiology, awareness, and care delivery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: