Why the study?
The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and depressive symptoms remains unclear, particularly across different populations.
Does higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness reduce the incidence of depressive symptoms in older adults across different countries?
Does higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness reduce the incidence of depressive symptoms in older adults across different countries?
Higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with a reduced risk of incident depressive symptoms in older adults in the US and England, but unexpectedly with an increased risk in China.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher eCRF may link to lower depressive risk in some populations; leaves open cross-national mechanisms for prospective validation.
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a modifiable risk factor for chronic diseases, but its association with depressive symptoms remains unclear, particularly across different populations. We aimed to investigate the link between estimated CRF (eCRF) and incident depressive symptoms among individuals over 50 years old, and to explore potential cross-country variations in this association. Data were retrieved from three national cohorts: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, United States), the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA, England), and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, China). eCRF was estimated using sex-specific algorithms and categorized into low (quintiles 1), moderate (quintiles 2–3), and high (quintiles 4–5) levels. Depressive symptoms were measured using the 8-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-8) (cutoff ≥ 3) in HRS and ELSA, and the 10-item version (CESD-10) (cutoff ≥ 10) in CHARLS. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for potential confounders. This study included 13,680 participants (4195 from HRS, 5421 from ELSA, and 4064 from CHARLS) with median follow-ups of 9.78, 12.11, and 5.73 years, respectively. Depressive symptoms incidence was 22.79% in HRS, 22.15% in ELSA, and 40.58% in CHARLS. Per 1-SD increase in eCRF was associated with 9% lower risk of depressive symptoms in HRS (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87–0.96), 8% lower in ELSA (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87–0.97), but 6% higher in CHARLS (HR = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01–1.16). Compared with the low eCRF level group, high eCRF level was associated with decreased risk of depressive symptoms in HRS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55–0.85) and ELSA (HR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48–0.79), but increased risk in CHARLS (HR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01–1.61). Subgroup analyses revealed that the associations were modified by smoking status (HRS), by gender and presence of diabetes (ELSA), and by the presence of hypertension (CHARLS) (P for interaction < 0.05). A higher level of eCRF was associated with reduced depressive symptoms risk in the US (HRS) and England (ELSA) older adults but with increased risk in China (CHARLS), emphasizing the need for nation-specific public health strategies. Question: It is unclear whether cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), a crucial modifiable factor, is associated with depressive symptoms incidence among elderly populations in different countries. Findings: In population-based studies conducted in three different countries, higher estimated CRF was significantly associated with a lower risk of depressive symptoms in the United States (US) and England cohorts but was unexpectedly associated with a higher risk in the China cohort. Meaning: It is essential to improve CRF levels among older populations in the US and England. However, in China, other factors associated with depression risk may play a more significant role than CRF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: