Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conventional analyses of labor market fluctuations ascribe a minor role to labor force participation . We show, by contrast, that flows-based analyses imply that the participation margin accounts for around one-third of unemployment fluctuations. A novel stock-flow apparatus establishes these facts, delivering three further contributions. First, the role of the participation margin appears robust to adjustments for spurious transitions induced by reporting error. Second, conventional stocks-based analyses are subject to a stock-flow fallacy, neglecting offsetting forces of worker flows on the participation rate. Third, increases in labor force attachment among the unemployed during recessions are a leading explanation for the role of the participation margin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsby et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: