Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Monodisperse particles of varying size, shape, and deformability were produced using two microfluidic strategies. For both strategies, monodisperse emulsion droplets of a crosslinkable solution were generated via flow-focusing. Subsequently, droplets were crosslinked either on chip or in an external bath. On-chip gelation resulted in spherical particles; varying the degree of crosslinking varied the deformability systematically. The optimized flow-focusing device design separated the production of monodisperse aqueous alginate droplets and the on-chip introduction of crosslinking ions. Two features were then adapted to target softer particles: the dispersed phase design and the polymer choice. The alternative design used a sheathed dispersed phase, with the polymer solution surrounding an unreactive viscous core, which generated alginate particles with a softer core. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM) allowed access to a broad range of moduli. The resulting spherical particles were characterized using capillary micromechanics to determine the shear (G) and compressive (K) moduli. Particles with G = 0.013 kPa to 26 kPa and K = 0.221 kPa to 34.9 kPa were obtained; the softest particles are an order of magnitude softer than those previously reported. The second approach, based on earlier work by Hu et al., produced axisymmetric, non-spherical particles with fore-aft asymmetry. Alginate drops were again formed in a flow-focusing device but were crosslinked off-chip in an external gelation bath. By changing the bath viscosity, crosslinker concentration, and outlet height, the falling droplets deformed differently during gelation, resulting in a variety of shapes, such as teardrop, mushroom, and bowl shapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: